If you give me fifteen minutes I can show you how to change the world

Posted on 10/28/2008
Stats and Ratings
Viewed: 3083 times with 0 ratings from similar users
(rate this article yourself below)

If water can be burned as a fuel source, then why hasn't it been done before?
Because people aren't capable of following directions, and are either
guilty of too little confidence in their abilities, or have too much.
If you read this to the end, and follow my suggestions, and the links
I provide maybe we will see this technology at last. Before I start
there are some things you should know. I am not a writer, which will
become evident if you choose to continue reading. I am not a
physicist, a mathematician, an electronics expert nor a salesman. So
this is free knowledge. However it may cost you some money...you may
be so intrigued by this information that you will buy the materials
(I don't sell them) and begin to experiment yourself. Stan Meyer
fans, stick around, because for everything you think you know there
is still more to learn, trust me, and bear with me while I attempt to
tell the story first, and then we will get to the good stuff.

Stan Meyer was a man that made some very bold claims in the late
1980's. He claimed to have run a car on water. In fact he did run a
car on water. With an apparatus that he had designed and patented he
was able to break H2O down into its component gasses. Not through
electrolysis as it is originally thought of, but through an entirely
unique electrolysis process. His claims were witnessed by scientists,
government officials, including the patent officials where he had to
prove his claims to get the patents, and numerous media outlets.
In 2005 I decided to build a propane injection system for a hopped up
diesel truck that I have. With the horsepower in my NA (naturally
aspirated) diesel I couldn't afford to have my EGT's get any higher,
so I was looking to add water vapor injection with the LPG to keep
the temperatures at an acceptable level. While searching I came
across hydrogen or HHO boosters. I instantly became intrigued.
Propane burns slow, combined with diesel it raises the exhaust gas
temperatures (EGT), but hydrogen burns so fast it would actually aid
the combustion without a serious increase in the EGT's. That would
allow me to increase my injector pump pressures, and add even more
hydrogen. Win-win situation. Sorry to digress. I had no intention of
buying any "HHO cell". My intentions were to decide on a system, and
build one that is custom to my application. So while researching
these systems I came across Stan Meyer's WFC, the water fuel cell. At
first I was a skeptic, so
I set out to learn as much as I could about the science behind it.
My first stop was the internet where I found a quite a few people
were already researching these WFC's, after seeing that all of these
people were working on the idea and yet no-one had been able to
produce the results that had been witnessed and reported by impartial
people, and even some that used to be skeptics I became even more
interested. I am very good at solving riddles.
Never one to be guilty of too little confidence I set out to learn
everything that I could about the science of electrolysis, the water
molecule itself, and the inventor of the WFC.

Electrolysis is simply creating a magnetic field and using it to
decompose chemicals into their components. In the form of water it
becomes hydrogen and oxygen. My first experiment was two stainless
steel perforated plates separated by 1/16 of an inch. For power I
used a 12 volt trolling motor battery. I got some production, enough
to prove that the science was valid, and warranted further study.
Next I studied the water molecule. I hadn't really paid attention in
school; I was too preoccupied with more important things. The H2O
molecule is a neat little thing; it is comprised of two H atoms and
one O atom. The little thing holding them together is the electron.
The electron is the only bonding force, however try pulling three
magnets apart, not very hard is it, now take a swimming pool and fill
it with magnets and try pulling one of them out, it becomes a lot
harder because the force is increased over the entire surface area,
and they are all bonded together. That is water in its natural state.
But what makes this situation interesting is that it is not a simple
electromagnetic bond, it is an electrostatic bond called the covalent
bond. Scuffing your feet loads you up with electro-static energy, and
touching something conductive discharges that energy. That means that
if the electrostatic charge on an electron can be discharged, it will
cease to
bond. At first I dived in, almost expecting to have to go back to
school and get a doctorate in chemistry. After getting this far I
decided that maybe I should investigate Mr. Meyer a little bit. If
this guy is some kind of super genius then I wouldn't stand a chance
at learning enough without some additional higher learning. What I
learned about Stan Meyer sent me right back to my studies with a
renewed vigor. He studied at an advanced energy sciences college, but
never graduated. Remember that fact because it will become relevant.

During my investigation of Stan I began to realize that he wasn't a
super genius, he wasn't a mad scientist, what he seemed to be was
just a "good old boy" with some above average intelligence. How had
he come to this discovery? I read every article about, and by Stan
Meyer that could be found posted on the internet, and published in
any book at the library. (Yes they still exist) I watched every video
clip with him in it; from news stories about him to home videos of
his lectures and his "car that ran on water".

"To study a thing is to understand a thing"

There in lies the secret, to understand the invention I didn't first
need to study the mechanics of it, I first needed to understand the
inventor. He was what confused me, he confused everybody. He used
terms that weren't exactly correct, and in fact some of the things he
said were quite misleading. His patents skated around the issues and
seemed to be lacking in relevant information. So once again I went
back to watching the videos, I studied them. I slowed them down I
paused them; I watched his mannerisms and studied the man. I came to
some very enlightening conclusions during that time. About not only
Stan, but the people working on replicating his WFC as well.
No one likes to share their secrets, and every one has a reason why.
Of all the places on the web that preach information sharing, only a
few have attempted to share anything, and I believe that is only
showboating. A technology worth billions is not something anyone
wants to share, they want to be the first, and they expect to get
rich either through sales or becoming famous. The simple fact is if
the information is given away someone will get rich manufacturing the
cells and or selling them. But if I give everybody the technology,
there will be too much competition to charge to a fortune.

Stan turned down millions offered to him by the representatives of an
Arab oil company to just sit on the technology. I believe him, and I
suspect that they were from the U.A.E. Not Saudi Arabia as some have
speculated. Gentlemen, I tell you now, I know how Stan made his cell
operational; it worked as he said, and if anyone offers me a few
million to stop telling the world, then I will take their money and
take care of my family and shower them with gifts. And I highlighted
it to let them know in case they are reading it. In the meantime I am
going to let the world know that the technology is available, is
viable and is extremely valuable. Do not let anyone get rich from
selling you this thing which anyone can build, the key to the WFC is
in the electronics that Stan used, and he had said that himself.

Stan used an old alternator powered by an AC motor, a signal
generator, and his VIC (voltage intensifier circuit) along with his
cell to produce this amazing amount of hydrogen or HHO on demand. And
this is where the story gets convoluted so bear with me and I will
clarify it at the end I promise you.

I studied the videos of Stan's cell so that I could build one like
it; I compared his cell to the hundreds on the web. They all used the
same basic materials, and configuration, so all I had to do was
gather a signal generator, an oscilloscope, and 12 volt DC power
source, build the cell and get on with it. So that's what I did. I
chose to use flat plates instead of the tubes that Stan had settled
on because I had some around my shop and from my experiments found
that the shape wasn't as relative as was the technique. Next I needed
to double my voltage. This was an easy task, I simply used a 24v
850ma transformer that I had from an old fuel furnace. This solved
two things, first it was close to the 26v that Stan used, and second
it was low amperage. Next I made an induction coil salvaged from a
stun-gun (crazy huh) and placed it in the circuit. By adjusting the
frequency and pulsing the voltage I now had some pretty good
production, next I gated the
pulses switching the voltage off after about three seconds, when the
power switched off the primary coil's power was interrupted causing
the secondary coil on the induction coil to fire sending the voltage
way into the kilovolt range. The gas production was getting better.
After a lot of toying with it I realized I had hit the same plateau
as everyone else. The secret eluded me. I could make gas, but I
couldn't make the gas just pour off like Stan. That is until I
started listening to Stan Meyer. In his videos his speeches are
always rehearsed, that is evident because they are almost verbatim.
So it would seem that Stan didn't know as much about this system that
he created as one would be led to believe, he never answered the
technical questions asked of him by people that had obviously done
their homework, he would just blow it off. One day I went about
researching free electrons, and came across what I thought was a
paper by Stan because it was
discussing "liberated" electrons. Lo and behold it was written by
Andrija Puharich. His studies and even his drawings were almost an
identical match to Stan's work, yet they were written before, and in
the earliest stages of Stan's development. I came to the realization
that Stan may have been doing the same thing as everybody studying
his work. Trying to replicate someone else's work and be as cryptic
as possible so that no one else would catch on to him, the only
difference was that Stan had actually surpassed the other inventors
results, that is when it hit me...That is why Stan had went to that
particular college and then dropped out. This man was no failure; he
went to that school for a single purpose, to learn specifically about
the studies of Andrija Puharich and none other than Nikola Tesla. He
went to increase his knowledge on the very thing he was at home
working on once he had learned what he needed he dropped out, he
needed to apply his time
to his mission. That was his goal, not a degree. It always struck me
as odd that Stan would go from sales into science, he didn't have a
background in it, so how could this idea just "pop" into his head. He
says God, I say whatever. Now Andrija had a motive to be tampering
with this stuff, he had a background story. He found that he could
disassociate the atoms in water molecules using ultrasonic and ELF
frequencies while searching for a way to break up blood clots with
non-invasive techniques. But once he was unsuccessful in that respect
he moved on to other things. Somehow Stanley got a hold of this idea
and started working on it. So ok, he felt that God had led him to
this great idea, and maybe he did, but the concept justified his
needing to learn more. (I should have been a detective)
But after further research I found that I wasn't the only one that
had stumbled on to this, there were others, and yet still no one had
found success. Why?

With this new information I now had other avenues to investigate, new
theories to test , more nights without sleep, and then another
epiphany. Well actually a $139.00 stroke of good misfortune. My
alternator went bad in my truck, the very truck that had started this
whole mess in the first place. A diesel engine does not have all of
the excess wiring that a gasoline engine does; it lacks an electronic
ignition, a coil, and the computer "brain". So as some of you that
have ever put a radio in an older car may recall, if you wire it up
directly to the battery you get to hear what? An incessant squealing
that comes through the radio speakers, and when I changed my
alternator I did just that, when I reconnected the battery and
started my truck the radio was on an AM station. And of course I
heard the whine change pitch when I revved the engine. This whine is
caused by the rotation of the shaft (oscillations) creating a radio
frequency that runs through your
cars wiring. Yahtzee! In newer cars all of the excess wiring soaks
up the signal and filters it out.
This is the reason Stan used the alternator, maybe he didn't not have
the knowledge necessary to create a complex circuit that consisted of
an Amplitude Modulated audio frequency inducted onto a carrier wave.
That is what Andrija Puharich had used in his studies, and an
alternator does just that. So now I had the key or so I thought. If I
used my alternator and removed the voltage regulator I would get a
good amount of voltage and the audio frequency in one bundle, but how
do I adjust the frequency? By adjusting the speed at which the
electric motor turns my new "oscillator" . I didn't have an electric
motor around so I pulled the pulley, and used an electric drill on a
bolt screwed into the shaft, I checked it with an ammeter and was
getting way to many amps, just like everyone else, so I placed a
jumper wire on the terminals to "fool" the alternator into thinking
that there was a fully charged battery hooked up to it thereby
cutting the amps to almost
nothing and keeping the voltage high,
After hooking everything up to an old signal generator I started
messing around with settings, by adjusting the dial on the drill's
trigger I could increase and decrease the speed thus modulating the
audio frequency, the voltage did not go through a VIC as Stan used
because I did not know how to build one, instead going through the
stun-gun coil, now I looked for a toroid coil, because Stan said he
used one, I found one and was going to put it in the circuit until I
found out what they do, they actually filter out RF interference,
which is exactly what the audio oscillator was needed for. I assumed
that Stan had just made a mistake and actually had meant an induction
coil because nowhere in his patent does he show a toroid coil in the
circuit. Because if it had been, the thing wouldn't have worked at
the patent office, and if it was present in the schematic and not in
the circuit it would have raised some eyebrows. Old Stanley had used
that as a ruse, if
someone had used a toroid they will not get the audio frequency that
is needed to make the cell work. Misinformation to help protect his
work from duplication perhaps? Since my cell now had an audio
frequency going through it the electrodes were almost humming, they
had become the "excitors" that Stan referred to. And my gas
production, at times was just more than at previous times, but when I
would switch the pulsing voltage to off and the secondary windings
discharged, it scared me to have the thing indoors. Production went
off the charts. I thought the water was going to literally boil out.

I have made the cell, I have investigated the man, and found out he
was continuing Puharich's work, and I later found out that his VIC is
just a simple Tesla resonant tank circuit. But wait there's more.

As I let the cell run and continued to play with the frequency, the
pulsing time and the audio frequency (by varying the drill speed) I
found sweet spots where the water was almost boiling and would
disappear at a rate where it was actually a visible action. You could
watch as the water disappeared, but then it would slow and have to be
tuned again. After awhile nothing I could do made any production and
I had actually topped off the cell three times. Lucky for me I was
outside because what happened next would have blown the roof off of
the house had I been inside with all of the gas I had just made over
an hour period, I stuck my hand into the cell to pull the plates,
with the electric off (of course) and it still almost electrocuted
me, it actually sparked. I quickly double checked and sure enough
everything was off. I checked the cell, and it had stored about 3
amps and 10 volts. I am not sure how much discharged when I stuck my
hand in there, but let
me tell you it cracked liked a baby lightening bolt and made my
knuckles ache for a while. I thought that was pretty amazing; I
decided to go over everything once more, just to make sure that I
wasn't missing anything. I still hadn't used the oscilloscope, I
don't even know how. And later that week I had to return the
equipment to the person I had borrowed it from. But I was fine, I was
satisfied that I had actually achieved some success or so I had
thought. I went back to searching for others that should have
achieved success by now so that I could hopefully share my
experiences. and yet no one had achieved anything, after two years
not one other person knew this? So now my selfish nature has just
reared its ugly head, I wanted money before I just gave my hard work
over to some one else to profit from. I could care less about fame.
So I went back to studying the tapes, I wanted to find out who Stan's
sources were, who offered him the money. Maybe I
could get some of that. I would love to tell my wife that we are
millionaires and that she'll never have to work again, I'd love to be
able to buy a couple hundred acre farm in Colorado and build some
jeeps to wheel. I'd even move my mother in-law out there. (Playing on
the heart strings for that bribe)
Life would be real sweet if I could just find out who wanted Stan's
work and get in touch with them. I found one of them. But in the
meantime I wanted to perfect this thing.
While studying the tapes for the hundredth time I came to a point
where Stan talks about the capacitance of the cell. I hadn't really
understood before but I think I do now. The cell works at high
voltage while limiting the amperage. Think of the electric as water.
The voltage is the pressure, the current is the volume. If you try to
fill up a 5gal. container with a pressure washer it will take you
quite a while to do it. But the stream will shoot a distance, so you
can fill it up from across the yard. That is voltage.
Now fill the same bucket up with the garden hose that was hooked to
the pressure washer, it will fill the bucket quicker. Twice as fast
in most cases, but at a shorter spray distance than the pressurized
stream. That is because you have lost the "potential" energy by
increasing the volume, to put the stream out at the same distance
(get the workout of it) you have to do one of two things, limit the
volume(amps) which means pressurize the stream (induction coil and
circuitry) or increase the flow rate (larger more powerful water
pump/power source), and increasing amperage increases the danger, and
increases the energy being used to create the gas, making it an
inefficient process.
What we are trying to do is get the voltage to go a long distance
through some highly resistive material, so by decreasing the volume
we increase the potential (work that pressure alone can do) because
it does not require more power, and volume (amperage) just fills the
container (cell) faster, reducing and ultimately stopping its
So to say it in Stan speak (I hope you understand now). By limiting
the amps we allow the potential (amp free voltage) to take over, yet
we still ultimately end up with amperage saturating the WFC, this
amperage comes from the minimal current we are putting in, but also
comes from another source as well. Since there is no continuity for
the current to pass through easily it charges the cell and becomes
free electrons. And I believe that the audio frequency being inducted
onto the anode acts as an inhibitor keeping the current from being
able to leave the cell at the rate it is brought in to it. Also
current is nothing more than electrons. By breaking the covalent
bond, each molecule loses two electrons; these liberated electrons
remain in the water as well due to the capacitance, once "the
capacity" has been reached the cell can not release anymore gas
because there are now to many "free" electrons hanging around in the
cell that just reformulate the
bonds and attach at free points helping to make the covalent bonds
stronger by increasing the negative polarity of the molecules as a
whole, and create a static layer around the cathode and anode. I
believe that some of the free electrons do take on a slightly
positive charge, this static layer that builds around the electrodes
appears to trap the gas bubbles until it is discharged by either the
high voltage being gated off and shaking the cell freeing the gas
atoms thereby pulling the electrons away with it, or the polarities
of the "exciters" being momentarily switched. But if we harvest those
free electrons from the water we are helping the extraction process
by taking the generated stored current from the cell. This current
can then be used to supply power back to the electronics that power
the cell. Since Faraday only discussed the actual fracturing of the
covalent bond and did not account for the efficiency of higher grades
of stainless steel
being able to do the job without decomposing, and then "harvesting"
the free electrons that were "liberated" in the process as well as
those added by the process.. well I'll just leave that argument up to
the chicken before the egghead debaters for now.

All of this through luck, and misfortune. Those of you that are
studying this phenomenon are on the right track but in the wrong
position. Those who said it can't be done, you are wrong, it has been
done. Through the hard work and sheer genius of great men like Nikola
Tesla, Andrija Puharich, and Stanley Meyer.
These men who have been shunned in our history books for being
unconventional. Well if we are to examine history we will see many
cases of men with unconventional ideas that were proven right. Maybe
Stan can join their ranks.

An attempt at clarification

Now that you have the story behind this story, I will try to bring it
together for you without all of the history. And hopefully in simpler
terms then the mathematical algorithms and geek speak that Stanley
and Andrija.
The main difficulty in completing this project without a doubt will
be the construction of the electronics. A microprocessor will have to
be built, one that can provide or regulate all of the necessary
frequencies involved, as well as monitoring the cell to adjust the
frequencies accordingly. That is easier today than it would have been
even in 1992 when Stan realized it. And more possible than when
Andrija figured it out in the late 70's. Like most of us Andrija and
Stan Meyer just could not complete that single most crucial component
to the WFC. (I wonder if a nice little Palm Pilot could be utilized
as the brain)

Here is what I think will be required: (Remember, I am no electronics

An audio oscillator and maybe an amplifier, I didn't use an amplifier
but Andrija's schematic shows one.

A custom built microprocessor / built to control the frequency and
voltage parameters defined from the use of the signal generator and
an oscilloscope during pre-production testing and monitoring.

The microprocessor should be of a small and efficient design capable
of controlling the audio frequency / the voltage pulse timer / as
well as the voltage frequency to the desired parameters as set
through study with the use of a signal generator and oscilloscope
during pre-production testing and monitoring.

The microprocessor will also have to monitor the cell, and adjust all
frequencies accordingly, as the water's natural resonance will change
as the HHO is produced and contaminants are left in the cell. These
contaminants change the ability of the water to maintain a steady
resonance at a fixed frequency by changing the viscosity as the level
of solid contaminants rise to a higher ppm as the water is converted.
(Does anyone know what minerals cause a green/black scum to form?
Because that comes out of the tap-water where I live, in about 10
seconds there is a ½ inch layer of it on top of the water) (If you do
this in a glass container on a ceramic tile as I did you will be able
to hear the change in pitch from the glass & ceramic vibrations)

During the pulsing, the water will reach a state of near ionization,
aiding in the breakdown process due to weakening of the electrons.
The pulsing charges the H molecules natural polarity to a greater
extent while weakening the negative charge of the O molecule and
electrons, this allows the bond to move from 104.5° to a 109° angle,
reducing the dipolar regions hold on the H molecule and stretching
the bonding electron, which can now come into contact with more
positively charged molecules discharging the electrostatic charge and
momentarily switching off the covalent bond. And now the positive is
more positive, and the stronger negative is weakened, since the
oxygen atom is now less negative it actually has less attraction to
the hydrogen atom preventing it from readily reattaching. When the
voltage is turned off after peaking, the secondary winding of the
induction coil discharges sending the voltage into the high kilovolt
ranges stripping the atoms
away from each other before they can recover. I believe that the
audio frequency should be applied as a constant, not switching off
with the voltage. And by using a Tesla resonant tank circuit in
conjunction with an induction coil, voltage should reach
exponentially higher peak kilovolts. (I still don't know how that
Harvesting the free electrons from the cell will facilitate continued
effective and efficient production, storing them in a capacitor and
using them to assist in powering the cell. According to Stan Meyer,
storing the current from the cell and then using it to power the cell
you can actually create a closed loop system. This may sound
impossible, but think of it this way, a steam engine boils water to
make steam, the rapid expansion and movement of the air is what is
used to move the turbine engine, so energy is lost in the form of
heat, but a useful byproduct is now available to use again, the
water. The wasted energy is in fact not the heat from the steam, but
the heat used to create the steam. That energy is transferred into
the steam, but since it does not become a source of energy it is now
wasted. So by using high voltage potential to gather electrons from
water you lose energy in the form of hydrogen, but since you are
capturing the hydrogen for
use it isn't lost, and since you are now taking the voltage and
generated current back into the system, and using it, it isn't lost.
The amps are recaptured in the form of freed electrons, the voltage
potential's power, but since it is using hardly any amperage, you
need to add the kilovolt surges to make watts....I'll stop talking
there. It makes sense in my head, but it took me two long years to
get my head wrapped around it. The WFC works, I have done it, except
for the closed loop part, Stan has done it, and Andrija has done it.
I wonder if there are others.

Also Faraday's law is not broken as he intended it. He never counted
on using the potential energy of electricity (voltage) he only
thought in the terms of current, the power, he also never counted on
harvesting the liberated electrons. So if you only think of it as
using voltage to make usable electrons then the hydrogen would be the
wasted energy, if you only use it to make hydrogen then the electrons
become wasted energy in the form of both electric and heat. You can
create heat, electricity (running a generator) and even desalinate
water, there are a lot more possibilities then what I can think of.
But no matter what the waste is HHO gas and electricity. Both are
usable. At the end of the cycle using a car for example, the exhaust
is water, but that water needs to be recharged with photons which
come from the sun. So energy is being used, but not energy we use or
have to pay for. (FREE ENERGY)

This is all I can do for now. When I have the money to purchase the
electronics and start again I will. But in the meantime here is the
secret; I have a lot more to learn about electronics before I could
ever complete it. And a lot of you are suffering the same problem, to
confident in your abilities to ask for help, and to unwilling to
share your work out of fear of losing it. Since I can't do it, I give
it freely in the hopes that someone else can, it will take an
electronics expert to design a microprocessor to do just what I have
said here. And we will all be driving cars that run on water within a
year. Sorry Big oil. But as it was said "we didn't come out of the
Stone Age because we ran out of stones, and we won't come out of the
oil age because we run out of oil". We came out of the Stone Age
because our technology grew, and an idea was born, and that man
taught another man, and one after the other through history man has
learned from man and we
have grown because of our ability to learn from one another's ideas.
Only in this age of greed do we fear teaching because we may lose the
fame and fortune to another. How sad. As for the learning, most of
the people working on this technology are so smart that they look at
the cell and see how it is done, so they try based on what they know,
I wasn't that fortunate, I looked at the cell and saw how it was
made, but then I listened to what Stan was saying, and I had to learn
what he meant, as well as learn what was going on. Most of these
people already knew..and just like people have a propensity to do,
they do not listen to what they already know and they just jump right
in. If you look at the documentation and listen to Stan you will see
that he used the voltage coming from an alternator that was also used
to limit the amps, doubled with a VIC (Tesla's resonant tank circuit)
into his signal generator, then into the cell, only a couple of times
is the
toroid coil mentioned, but as I said it is either subterfuge, or he
meant induction coil. And with as much as he has kept secret, and let
speculation occur just to keep these very facts hidden, I go with

But I still wouldn't mind those millions that were offered to Stan.
I'd take the money; I have a family that I would like to spoil. In
the meantime I would settle for free gas and electricity, imagine how
much cheaper the world would be to live in without the extra bills.
As for the economy; that's just how the Feds generate their
paychecks. So don't worry about that, this technology would narrow
the gap between the rich and the poor and do it by saving the poor
some money, only big oil companies would feel the sting, and who
cares about them?
Oh' and that secret Government Agency that was going to fund
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, high risk, high payoff
I contacted them and told them I'd like to talk to someone about the
technology, that it can be done and I know how...Not one person
responded. In fact they made it impossible to contact them directly
after that, you now have to get a job with them to work on any
project. They won't take ideas. I have also contacted the energy
giants MOBIL/EXXON and BP, no response. They are only interested in
Hydrogen from fossil fuels. They rely on the fact that one man can't
do it alone.
Only the people want this technology so we have to make it ourselves.
If you think this is BS, which is up to you, fine keep doing it
wrong, but if you already have a working cell, a signal generator,
and an oscilloscope, what is the harm in adding an audio oscillator
to your arsenal? If you use an alternator as the oscillator don't
forget the jumper wire, and use a dimmer switch on that wire to
control the amperage. Too much will keep the alternator from
transferring voltage though it will still create the AM signal. By
the way, someone out there (I won't name names) is working on
Sonosonic breakdown of water molecules, basically taking a steel tube
filled with water and vibrating it with sound waves so fast that they
can get the water to split inside the area of cavitations. Sono is
from sonar, which is sound. An electronic tuning fork in water, hmmm
I wonder what would happen by adding high voltage DC and limiting the
amperage to the milliamp
Anyway folks, I can only tell you what I've learned and hope someone
smarter than me can take it to the next level. Give it a shot, and
let us all know how you make out. I'm not saying I'm smarter than
Stan, I only figured out what he did, he was on his way to perfecting
it before he died. I am openly admitting I have gone as far as I can;
the electronics are the key, the audio signal and pulsed high voltage
coupled with the right frequency modulations. I am not even sure that
super high k-volts are even necessary with the audio signal at the
right frequency.
Do this and you have it. But if anyone suddenly does it and tries to
make a huge profit from it without cutting me in for a piece..I'm
coming for you, and I don't want to hear that "coincidence" crap
either. Do the world some good, free us from fossil fuels and the
cancer it is putting in our air and water. Oh' and make it so I can
give my diesel another 50+ horsepower, if all the cars are burning
cleaner a little smoke won't hurt. Hell if someone can do it I'll go
with a gasser.
I'm not sure of everything that goes on in this system, it's just the
way it works. Try it for yourself. Most of the terminology is gleaned
from Stan, and I believe he uses it because whether or not it is
scientifically correct it feels right, and I know some will say there
is no proof because I have no videos or pics.well people I wasn't
doing it for a movie, you-tube or a book, I was doing it to put it in
my truck. And once I got it right maybe sell it for mucho dinero
contante, but since it is a useless piece of junk without the ability
to control it, I have no use for it. All I did was figure out why and
how Stan used that alternator instead of a battery or battery charger
for the DC voltage. As for the rest, look at what I am saying, and
then listen to Stan's lectures, it is that simple.
Or you can just do what I've said, but I'm sure you all are skeptics,
lord knows I am. I'm not selling it to you, I've explained it the
best I can, and I'm not saying, I'm running a car on it. I'm saying
some electronics genius needs to do the important part and then we
all can, that guy will be famous for it not me. If you want more I
can't give it, but I'm e-mailing this to every one I can in with the
hopes that someone can fix us up with a program, or controller to
keep it running instead of the constant tuning to keep it going. I'm
sick of buying fuel, and paying for electric, (and I still want that
HP for my diesel). Plus I can't get rich off of something I can't do,
so I figure if I can't be rich, and I'm not going to make someone
else rich, the only other solution is to make a lot of us a less poor
by saving money!
My cell was perforated stainless plates in a 1½ qt. glass jar,
nothing fancy.

A few links / make up your own mind (You need to remove the spaces to
make them work, A Yahoo Thing)
http://cartalk.com/content/columns/Archive/2001/March/01.html (a
link that talks about radio noise from alternators)
http://www.rexresearch.com/puharich/1puhar.htm (Puharich's work)
http://www.rexresearch.com/meyerhy/meyerhy.htm ( Some of Meyer's
work) http://www.familycar.com/Classroom/charging.htm (A short
course on the alternator)
http://www.waterfuelcell.org/ (good videos, these are filled with
clues that helped me immensely)
(Meyer lecture pt1)

(Meyer lecture pt2)

(Meyer lecture pt3)

(Meyer lecture pt4)

(Meyer's inspiration for the VIC)

(A compilation of Meyer's lectures)

Links to information on toroid coils and inductors

(cheapest acrylic cell tube I could find $20.00 for a 6" OD 23" long)

(A good place to order stainless tubing)

(Find a local SS supplier) 

Author Unknown

> Upgrade to a premium ScopeTrader account
What do you think of this article? Rate it and add your comments below:
Your rating of this article:

My comments about this article:
What others have said:
bottom corner